Hello Reuel, in terms of ergonomics and feeling I prefer using the GR or the GR II. My preference nevertheless goes to the GR which has a better AF. But in term of pure performance, the GR 3 is way better. But as you know the number of MP has nothing to do when it comes to Street. The only reason why I use the GR 3 is that all my cameras (GR, GRD IV) have flaws … As I don’t want to invest anymore, I just use what I have. It’s been a few months now that I only shoot with the GR3 and I get use to this camera. The AF still sucks, the autonomy is just lame and it still overheats… But hey I only have this camera left ! Well I could use the Fuji XF10 which is very good but I love the GR series.
The biggest step of the GR 3 is the better performance at high ISO. But for the rest the GR (or GR II) is enough and frankly the GR feels better in hands. May be the GR 3 is to tiny. I really mean it. The feeling I have is that the camera is not well balanced compared to the previous iteration

Stay away from the 3 ! But when you only have the GR3 as a valid GR, you need to make with what you have ! 😉 My idea is that a lot of people are happy with this camera. I need to figure out if it doesn’t come from me. I need to give his chance to this camera. I’m switching from a 10 MP camera to a 24 one ! It’s a huge step

I’m not convinced by the GR3x … My first feeling is that this number is doomed to me. The GR3 is not what I expected. The second thing is that the focal length is not mine. 40 mm is too narrow to me. I used to have the pancake lens on the Fuji XE2, the 27 mm. It made the combo on the XE2 so tiny. But I wasn’t able to get use to it. I just hope that the futur iteration of the GR will be more interesting. In the meantime, I will try to use the GR3